Log in

No account? Create an account

phalangingle in theoryishotcrew

Can I just substitute an interpretive dance in place of a list?

Although I am generally of the opinion that I would never be a member of a club that would have someone like me as a member, I decided to give this a try.

<input ... ><input ... >
<lj-cut text="List">

  1. "Foucault" in "Dictionnaire des philosophes" 1984, - Maurice Florence


  1. Distinction - Bourdieu


  1. El Laberinto de la Soledad - Paz


  1. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life - Goffman


  1. Borderlands/La Frontera - Anzaldua


  1. The Interpretation of Cultures  - Geertz


  1. Aberrations in Black - Ferguson


  1. Ain't I a Woman  - bell hooks


  1. Giving an Account of Oneself - Butler


  1. Selections from the Prison Notebooks - Gramsci

<input ... ></input><input ... >


Re: General opener

I meant linguistic devices. This point about theory using linguistic devices seems so obvious (theoretical works use metaphors, analogies; also theory uses literary devices such as allegory) that I can see why when I write things like "all theory is performed" it comes off as hog wash. "Performance," "performativity" and "performance studies" are overlapping and distinctly understood by different disciplines. I will draw out the implications to the performance point, and why I think reading theory as performed is important, in my reply to a priori for the Anzaldua question.

Re: General opener

I don't think that all theory is performance and metaphor. I agree that most literary theory is about analyzing rather than linguistic and literary devices. What I like about the Anzaldua is that it uses these devices not just to illustrate a theory that is taken as logically coherent and true before being exemplified, but instead, relies on these devices to build a rich and complex theory, one that is performed and cannot be separated from its performance.